  |
Quote:
|
|
Originally Posted by aliadam
So those of you that pick a friend to go to, do you pick someone who knows that person also??? The reason I ask is because that seems to place the person you're having a disagreement with in a difficult position.
Say there are friends A, B, & C. So A and B get into a disagreement. Friend A doesn't say anything to friend C because she doesn't want to put C in the middle of it since she's friends with B also. BUT...friend B runs to C and tells "her" side of the story, so friend C then is left thinking badly about A just because she only heard one side of the story. Just seems somewhat unfair to me.
|
|
I suppose this is bumping up an old thread, but I have been thinking about this post.
And I can honestly say that I have been A B and C at one point or another.
I have absolutely been A and not wanted to put anyone in the middle, C or anyone else. Probably because the disagreement wasn't worth it or it wasn't something that I was taking personally.
I can also say that I have been B, in that I have had disagreements with people and really wanted to resolve it, and most likely went to C for help and/or advice in correcting the situation. However, I can say that it never occurred to me that I would be putting C in an uncomfortable place, and that was selfish on my part. Thanks for opening my eyes to that point of view.
And last, I have been C, where someone has come to me on how to handle a situation because they had a disagreement with someone and wanted advice or help on how to proceed. I would like to think that it never influenced my opinion of A one bit. Just trying to help B through a "tough time".
I guess what I am saying here, is it depends on the situation, but I don't think that anyone ever has bad intentions, whether they are A B or C. I think it is all human nature and part of reality, not necessarily right or wrong.
Just my 2 cents for what they are worth.
