  |
|
Welcome to Mommysavers Forums.
|
| Entertainment Celebrity gossip, TV, movies, books, music, and more |
|
|
  |
12-21-2007, 12:37 AM
|
#41
|
|
|
|
|
For Richer or Poorer Mod
Last Online: Yesterday 10:08 PM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,876
|
There is one thing I simply don't get ... Aren't there thousands of young, talented, bright and pretty girls just dying for a chance to star in a TV series or movie? WHY does JL Spears or Brittany for that matter have to still be employed? I don't see the draw. I don't see any talent that makes them unique. I personally know girls who are FAR more talented. What happened to the network simply telling J L, "Gee, you're not quite the look we were going for in this series. Sorry."
__________________
"I've been rich and I've been poor but independently wealthy is where it is at."
|
|
|
|
|
  |
12-21-2007, 08:48 AM
|
#42
|
|
|
|
|
Mommysavers Goddess
Last Online: Yesterday 03:31 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas, y'all
Posts: 1,810
|
  |
Quote:
|
|
Originally Posted by taylyn
On a Side note...
Anyone else Find J- L quite Annoying??
I Don't Mind the show Zoe 101 - But her and Her Voice Drove me crazy.
I have always thought of Her and Brittney to be whiney bratty type of girls.
|
|
Well, I don't think you will be hearing it much longer. I'm thinking this is a huge blow to her career. She will be forever known for this. Maybe in many years she will be able to get sitcom work but I don't see her being a huge movie star. Maybe this is her passive aggressive way of not having to support her mom anymore. Momma Spears is getting desperate, though. She's already sold the unborn baby pics to OK magazine for 1 million which, btw, I think is completely gross pimping out the baby's image like that.
|
|
|
|
|
  |
12-21-2007, 11:08 AM
|
#43
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Mommysavers Member
Last Online: 11-21-2008 09:34 AM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 253
|
  |
Quote:
|
|
Originally Posted by carlitasway
Well, I don't think you will be hearing it much longer. I'm thinking this is a huge blow to her career. She will be forever known for this. Maybe in many years she will be able to get sitcom work but I don't see her being a huge movie star. Maybe this is her passive aggressive way of not having to support her mom anymore. Momma Spears is getting desperate, though. She's already sold the unborn baby pics to OK magazine for 1 million which, btw, I think is completely gross pimping out the baby's image like that.
|
|
I think the biggest message that could be sent right now is from Nickolodeon pulling that show immediatly. This would tell the young kids watching this that what has happened is not OK. But they are getting as much press about this as JL, helloooooo ratings are probably soaring to see if there is a "bump" or not.
(Contrary to some of the posters beliefs on here, I as well do NOT believe teen pregnancy is right, nor do I "support" JL. I feel for her, I feel for any teen parent as they have NO idea what they are actually in for. I am going to educate my DD as much as possible and leave that door of communication open. I'm not going to be that mom and think my DD is an angel. If, on some off chance she would come home pregnant, God hlep us......I will be throughly angry and disappointed. Will I kick her to the curb? God no. I will support her and love her as much as I did before she was pregnant. END OF STORY)
As another poster said, she probably will not feel what every new mom feels in the morning by getting up. SHe has enough money to get nannies and what nots.
I hate the idea that mama Spears has already made a deal(or several deals with OK mag) to interview JL about her cravings, baby names, and if they found out the sex of baby or not. Then after the baby is born, to show teen mama JL with new baby. Do I think this family is stable by any strech of the imagination? God NO! Do I think it is sad that when that issue of OK magazine comes out, it will probably sell out? Yes because our society thrives on drama!
Areafinn.....there is no reason for you to quit posting. Subjects get heated, it makes for good discussions and vents. No one got hurt here, did they? Keep posting girl.
I thought everyones opinions were quite interesting. It is what makes the world go round, right ladies?
__________________
Jenifer M
|
|
|
|
|
  |
12-22-2007, 07:49 AM
|
#44
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Mommysavers Member
Last Online: 08-08-2008 01:37 AM
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 177
|
  |
Quote:
|
|
Originally Posted by crazykelly
we can all agree that 16 is too young to take on this responsiblity..but lets face it, the family has $$ and its not like she's going to be groggy in the morning and trying to balance school, pt work and motherhood.
what i wanted to comment on is this - i think what angers most people is that this is yet another celebrity "no no" that is becoming more and more glorified as each day passes. our young kids are being subjected more and more to adult "stuff" that their tween celebs get themselves into and as parents the only way to control it is to forbid the stuff in our homes. the celebrity limelight is all over the place now, so if you intend on taking away all tv, computers, magazines, music...then you're up a creek
teens having sex? nothing new...for anyone. but its the moral standard that has gotten so low that now unwed teen moms are apart of the norm - and like it or not, our young kids do look up and revere these celebs. reading seventeen magazine is much different when i was 17 compared to now...now 17 mag is a thinner version of cosmo.
so each time mtv, vhi allows a show with a bit more sexual or violent content, another piece of childhood is chipped away. every time the kids tune into disney or nick at 7pm and the adults are perceived as idiots and the kids all are fashionistas, another chip. when the videos of their favorite songs are near **** mini movies, another chip. when we allow our kids to watch the "adult cartoons" ...another chip.
believe me, in 7 mos from now or whenever the baby is born, this will be big media and it will flash on every news channel, even fox that jlynn had her baby and both baby and mommy are just fine. she'll return to some type of tv as some paid nanny watches the kid and be rewarded for looking beautiful and bringing in cash for the network.
ok! off my .02
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
  |
12-22-2007, 08:01 AM
|
#45
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Mommysavers Member + Approved Trader
Last Online: 11-17-2008 09:54 AM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Davenport FL
Real Name: Wanda
Posts: 646
|
Ditto, Just because Jamie Lynn is in the public eye does not give anyone the right to judge her. She made a mistake and so does thousands of other girls her age. I say support her, she has already made the hardest decision by going public. As far as prosecuting the boy, this is exactly what is wrong with the whole sex offender system. He is a normal teenage boy who had sex with a normal teenage girl. Sex is normal and sex at 16 is normal. It isn't like Jamie is 12 or 13. Branding this boy as a sex offender is not the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
  |
12-22-2007, 09:40 AM
|
#46
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Mommysavers Member + Approved Trader
Last Online: 11-17-2008 12:26 PM
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 153
|
  |
Quote:
|
|
Originally Posted by carlitasway
Momma Spears is getting desperate, though. She's already sold the unborn baby pics to OK magazine for 1 million which, btw, I think is completely gross pimping out the baby's image like that.
|
|
Oh what a winner that mom is, hey? That just sickens me to no end.
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
  |
|
Members
|
|
|
|
  |
|
Sponsors
|
|
|
|
|