Welcome to Mommysavers Forums.
Go Back  

Money Matters Personal finance, managing debt, saving and investing

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Gallery iTrader

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 07-13-2007, 10:38 AM   #61
Default The best I've ever heard.
chopey
Mommysavers Goddess
 
Last Online: Today 04:25 PM
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: The great "country" of Texas
Posts: 1,829
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by vcudnik
A simple lesson in How Tax Cuts Work

Sometimes politicians, journalists and others exclaim; "It's just a tax cut for the rich!" and it is just accepted to be fact. But what does that really mean? Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, I hope the following will help. Please read it carefully.

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20." Dinner for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six men -- the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to eat their meal. So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than me!" "That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!" "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!" The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start eating overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

That's the best way it's been explained yet....everyone should read this post and then it will all make sense. Thanks for putting it in layman's terms for us. But yes, this is exactly how it works. The ones who pay nothing, want to complain, when someone gets a break and they still pay nothing. Makes no sense. Anyway, wonderful post!
chopey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 03:34 PM   #62
Default
anniebananie
Mommysavers Diva
 
anniebananie's Avatar
 
Last Online: 07-21-2008 07:00 AM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Central Virginia
Posts: 546
iTrader: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdhill007
That's why we need more women in The Senate, Congress and President. We have the common sense when it comes to money and how it should be spent.
I'm sorry, but I can't agree with this entire statement.

I agree that women, on average, hoave more common sense and how it should be spent, I think that having more women running the show in Washington would not make much difference at all. Why? Because power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely (don't ask me who first said this, I can't remember). And it's all about power up there.

What we need to do is to raise our voices to our elected officials and tell them that we think the tax policies in this country are hideously out of date and unfair, to both rich and poor, and esepcially for those in between. And we need to keep telling our elected officials - with our voices and our votes. It will take years to affect a change - perhaps even a generation. But if we start now, and if we teach our children to continue, then maybe, just maybe, by the time that they have children, we will have a reformed tax system in this country.

OK. Off my soapbox now.

rdhill007 - I truly meant no offense at commenting on your post. I hope you understand that. I just get on these rants sometimes, and well....
__________________
check out my blog: http://anniebananie.wordpress.com
anniebananie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2007, 06:48 PM   #63
Default
rdhill007
Senior Mommysavers Member
 
Last Online: 02-01-2008 06:47 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 138
iTrader: (0)
No offense taken. I was po'ed at few men in my family when I typed it.
rdhill007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2007, 02:50 PM   #64
Default
mommytosa
Mommysavers Goddess
 
mommytosa's Avatar
 
Last Online: 01-07-2009 09:22 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,148
iTrader: (0)
I didn't read all the posts. Here is my answer:

No. I beleive a national sales tax is the solution. I think that food an essential clothing should be excluded from this tax.
mommytosa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Members
 

Sponsors

 


Advertisement

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0