  |
09-11-2007, 09:00 PM
|
#3
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Mommysavers Member & Approved Trader
Last Online: 09-28-2007 04:50 PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 258
|
My husband was the general contractor on four spec homes in the early 90's in California. If you can general it yourself and are in a high cost real estate area, your house should be worth approximately 100K more than you have in it if it is approx. 2500 sq. feet. This also works if you are owner-builder. However, you had to get your lot at a good price. This is assuming you will do most of the painting (inside and out with the electric sprayer). I am not factoring in doing carpentry, plumbing, electrical work, etc.
You will not make this sort of money if you hire a general contractor. They will generally bid on the house per square foot (will cost much more than if you owner-builder it yourself.) However, in a high cost real estate market, hiring a contractor can sometimes be cheaper than buying a house. If you are in the mid-west, deep South, and some other lower cost real estate markets, in most areas of those regions, you can buy an older pre-existing home much cheaper than the building costs for a new one. If you don't know what you are doing, I don't recommend it. One big mistake can cost you $20,000. That is why people often hire contractors - to avoid making several costly mistakes in just one house (which I have seen happen).
We are currently in the best of both worlds. My husband has been a general contractor, but a good contractor is in our church and is going to give us a price break with my husband doing part of the general contracting work too. We have peace of mind for not much more than it would cost for my husband to do it all by himself. (His current job keeps him too busy to do all the work being an owner-builder would require.)
|
|
|
|
|