  |
03-18-2008, 07:38 AM
|
#32
|
|
|
|
|
Mommysavers Addict
Last Online: Yesterday 09:19 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 6,618
|
I agree with Kim. In Economics 101, you learn about what Kim is saying. If you are young (below 40), you don't need to be paying off your mortgage, but investing in higher yielding stocks, bonds, shoot, even CDs or money market accounts! It just makes sense! I understand there is a psychological aspect to owning your own home, definitely, but it just does not make sense to be so caught up in paying it off NOW if you are not getting the most from your money. I agree you need to pay down your credit debt and other consumer debt as soon as possible. But, typically, cars do not appreciate in value, period. Homes do, so it is a better investment anyways.
For example, we have a 20 year mortgage at 5.375%. We also bought our home at a REALLY good time so our mortgage payments are very, very low. It would be foolish to take an extra $500 and put it towards our mortage given our ages (which are 38 and 43, on the cusp of "old") when we can put it in an account where we can get up to 8%. Over a 5 year time we would put $30K towards our mortgage, sure, but we losing 8% over that 5 year time. If you look at what we would be gaining on our mortgage savings, that is only 5.375%. We could then, when we are older, pay off the mortgage, if we so choose for psychological benefits, or continue to reap a greater reward at 8%. We will have it paid off, or a similar home if we so choose, before retirement. Plus, if we retire, we will probably move anyways to a smaller home. It is simple math, as Kim is pointing out.
From what I have read of Dave Ramsey, he takes debt reduction from a Christian perspective of having NO debt, period. I get that on a consumer credit aspect, but a home is not a consumer credit issue. Those are credit cards, car loans, any other type of consumer good. A home is not a consumer good as much as a long term investment. That is where I don't agree with him.
|
|
|
|
|