I draw the line at any debt, payments, or basically getting anything that would require us to go beyond using
only my dh's income to pay for it. Even when I worked a few hours, we never relied on what I made for anything, except it was fun $ that we could afford to lose if I no longer worked. (other than in college, when we used every cent for expenses). So any extras, such as our dirtbikes and atv's that we ride as a family and that our children race, come out of dh's income only...and that's only
after health and life insurances, savings, debts, retirement, etc. are taken care of. Any expenses associated with riding...parts, gear, gas...have to also come out of only dh's pay...no relying on having to provide any additional income or taking from "necessity" $. By handling our finances like this, if more money
needed to be available, then I could go to work and know all of it could go to whatever the need is. We also handle any extras for the kids this way...activities or any extras beyond regular necessities are paid only out dh's available extra income.
I think what happened with many people, is that they spent every penny, even if both spouses worked, or went into debt to get these things. They didn't leave any flexibility in their finances. If they weren't saving at all and then spending every last penny on Versaces, vacations, too much house or car, then I think it was only a matter of time before something came up that would make them very short on $...higher gas, food, etc...then they have to sell the extras or go get a second, third job. I just really think leaving room for inflation, etc. in finances is important.
I agree with others that I favor experiences over things, but I don't think there's anything wrong with someone enjoying nice clothing or a Versace, if they enjoy that...
and if they can truly afford it.
There are also many family "experiences" that require "things" in order to do them...boating, skiing, camping, etc. I don't think people should be judged for spending on these things...no one knows if they truly value the "things" more than their relationships. I also don't think there's anything wrong with spending $$ to fly to Italy for a couple of weeks

...
if you can afford it and still pay for shelter and food.
ETA: I guess I should add...I really, really WANT to go to Italy!