  |
02-11-2008, 12:38 PM
|
#5
|
|
|
|
|
For Richer or Poorer Mod
Last Online: Today 05:16 PM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,951
|
The child knows s/he was misbehaving but there is no consciousness of right or wrong. In other words, the child knows Mommy will be upset but the child can't relate to the idea of destroying things being a sinful act.
Let me put it this way ... we all know stealing is 'wrong'. Let's say you and your children are lost in the wood. You finally happen upon a cabin. You break in and eat some of the food that was left there. Technically, you're stealing even if you intend to re-imburse the cabin owner later. However, because this is a life-or-death situation, eating food that isn't yours is justified.
A 2-yr old can't make those leaps of reasoning. If stealing is wrong, then it is always wrong. If it is okay to sometimes steal because you're starving, then s/he will take the food off your plate at the dinner table when they want a little bit more to eat. It is ALL justified. There are no levels of moral decision making.
My advice ... maintain a sense of humor. Having a 2-yr old can be really fun.
__________________
"I've been rich and I've been poor but independently wealthy is where it is at."
|
|
|
|
|