  |
06-23-2008, 02:13 PM
|
#3
|
|
|
|
|
Mommysavers Goddess
Last Online: Yesterday 06:57 PM
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbia, MD
Posts: 1,388
|
Well, I have both and there are pros and cons to each. I can tell you that with a 3 year old you're probably going to be better off with the sit'n'stand - a double is pretty much overkill with an older child.
My double is a Graco DuoGlider LX. I love the large cargo basket, it's really easy to steer, and it folds up pretty well for a double stroller (better than my single or sit'n'stand). A lot of people complain about how heavy the tandem double strollers get (especially when you have two older children in them) but it never really bothered me. It is heavy, but I never had a problem lifting it in and out of my car. Honestly the only reason I stopped using it is because my older son never really rode in it anymore so I was basically pushing a double stroller with only one kid in it.
My sit'n'stand I bought used from a friend. I think the brand is Swan. I love the seating arrangement and so do my kids (they are 2 1/2 and 4 1/2). It's the only stroller I use right now, and that's the reason why. Unfortunately, it's really hard to turn, the cargo basket is small, and I hate the way it folds - it takes up more room in the back of my van than my double would have.
At the end of the day, the sit'n'stand meets my kids needs at the stage they're at now which is why I use it. The double stroller - as much as it was easier for ME to use, just isn't necessary anymore.
__________________
Stephanie
Mom to: Caleb (8-27-2003), Ian (9-28-2005), & Baby Boy #3 (EDD 11-9-2008)
|
|
|
|
|